Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences - 2006; 22(1-2)
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org
Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences - RSS feed of 2006; 22(1-2)1300-0705March 2006Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1300-0705
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=82
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220102006-03-01005Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=83
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220192006-03-01011Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=84
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220262006-03-01021Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=85
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220302006-03-01027Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=86
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220382006-03-01031Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=87
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220432006-03-01039Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=88
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220492006-03-01045Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=89
7 for refrigerated samples and
7.4x10 6 cfu/g for frozen samples. TMA counts of hamburger balls were
found as 3.1X10 6 for frozen samples and 3,3x106 for refrigerated
samples. Counts of coliform bacteria and coliform contaminated samples in Inegol
meat balls were found higher than minced meat and hamburger ball samples. As a
result, although E. coli 0157:H7 was not detected in all samples, E C0//O157
serotype was found as 8.69% for Inego! meat balls, 9.37% for hamburger balls and
2.43% for minced meat samples. Higher coliform bacteria contamination of Inegol
meat balls and hamburger samples than minced meat and highest microbiological
counts in Inegol meat balls show that hygienic conditions were low in the
production of these meat products.]]>2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220572006-03-01051Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=90
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220632006-03-01059Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=91
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220682006-03-01065Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=92
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220742006-03-01069Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=93
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220822006-03-01075Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=94
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220882006-03-01083Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=95
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2220942006-03-01089Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=96
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2221032006-03-01095Original Article
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=97
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2222006-03-01104Erratum
http://www.eurasianjvetsci.org/text.php3?id=98
2006-03-01Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences1-2221112006-03-01105Original Article